|
Articles / Cause and effect diagram
The Cause & Effect (CE) diagram, also sometimes called
the ‘fishbone’ diagram, is a tool for discovering all the possible
causes for a particular effect. The effect being examined is normally some
troublesome aspect of product or service quality, such as 'a machined part
not to specification', 'delivery times varying too widely', 'excessive
number of bugs in software under development', and so on, but the effect may
also relate to internal processes such as 'high rate of team failures'.
The major purpose of the CE Diagram is to act as a first
step in problem solving by generating a comprehensive list of possible
causes. It can lead to immediate identification of major causes and point to
the potential remedial actions or, failing this, it may indicate the best
potential areas for further exploration and analysis. At a minimum,
preparing a CE Diagram will lead to greater understanding of the problem.
The CE Diagram was invented by Professor Kaoru Ishikawa of
Tokyo University, a highly regarded Japanese expert in quality management.
He first used it in 1943 to help explain to a group of engineers at Kawasaki
Steel Works how a complex set of factors could be related to help understand
a problem. CE Diagrams have since become a standard tool of analysis in
Japan and in the West in conjunction with other analytical and
problem-solving tools and techniques.
CE Diagrams are also often called Ishikawa Diagrams, after their inventor,
or Fishbone Diagrams because the diagram itself can look like the skeleton
of a fish.
Use it when you start
investigating a problem
Construct a CE Diagram whenever you need to investigate
the causes or contributing factors for an effect (be it a quality
characteristic or other outcome) which is of concern to you. This will most
likely be after you have conducted a general investigation of problems for a
particular function, product, or service, and ranked them using a Pareto
Chart. The effect ranked highest provides the starting point for a CE
Diagram.
For example, you may just have completed an investigation
of all the reasons recorded for goods being returned by customers and found
that the highest incidence relates to incorrect goods being sent. A CE
Diagram can be constructed to explore the possible causes for this.
Developing a CE Diagram in a team meeting is a very
effective technique for,
-
concentrating team members' attention on a specific
problem
-
pooling, and reflecting back, team thinking
-
constructing a picture of the problem at hand without
resorting to the tight discipline of a flowchart
How to draw CE diagram
This is a three step process.
Step 1
Write down the effect to be investigated and draw the
'backbone' arrow to it. In the example shown below the effect is 'Incorrect
deliveries'.

Step 2
Identify all the broad areas of enquiry in which the
causes of the effect being investigated may lie. For incorrect deliveries
the diagram may then become:

For manufacturing processes, the broad areas of enquiry
which are most often used are Materials (raw materials), Equipment (machines
and tools), Workers (methods of work), and Inspection (measuring method).
Step 3
This step requires the greatest amount of work and
imagination because it requires you (or you and your team) to write in all
the detailed possible causes in each of the broad areas of enquiry. Each
cause identified should be fully explored for further more specific causes
which, in turn, contribute to them.

You continue this process of branching off into more and
more directions until every possible cause has been identified. The final
result will represent a sort of a 'mind dump' of all the factors relating to
the effect being explored and the relationships between them.
Different types of CE
Diagram
There are three different types of CE Diagram. The basic
type explained above is called the Dispersion analysis type. The other two
are the Production process classification type and the Cause enumeration
type.
Production
classification type
This type differs from the basic type above in that each
discrete stage in the production process leading up to the effect being
examined is shown along the main arrow or 'backbone' of the diagram.
Possible causes are then shown as branches off these as shown in the
illustration overleaf.

This type of CE Diagram is often easier to construct and
understand because those involved are already familiar with each of the
production steps identified.
Cause enumeration type
This is not so much a different type of diagram but a
different method of constructing a diagram. Instead of building up a chart
gradually (starting with the 'backbone', deciding broad areas, then adding
more and more branches), you postpone drawing the chart and simply list all
the possible causes first. Then draw the chart in order to relate the causes
to each other. This method has the advantage that the list of possible
causes will be more comprehensive because the process has a more free-form
nature. The disadvantage is that it is more difficult to draw the diagram
from this list rather than from scratch.
This method of drawing a CE Diagram can be used in
conjunction with Brainstorming by using it to distil the brainstorm output
down into a logical and useable set of information.
What to do with the
completed CE diagram
Most of the value of CE Diagrams lies in the process used
to produce them. This process leads to ideas and insights into the problem
which you would not otherwise have had, and which will give you leads for
further investigation or for experimenting with possible solutions.
When developed by a team, the CE Diagram becomes a sort of
'shared conceptual space' in which the problem is examined in common by all
team members with the results that,
Since it takes some time to get to the heart of most
problems, the CE Diagram can also be used as a working document which is
changed as new data is collected and different solutions tried.
Good and bad CE diagrams
A good CE diagram is one which explores all possibilities
so it is likely to be large and complex-looking as twig after twig sprouts
for each new related idea noted down. Be suspicious of CE Diagrams with few
factors, or which are neat and well ordered. These may reflect a lack of
knowledge of the situation, or show that the effort to draw the diagram was
not creative and exhaustive enough.
Other references
Kaoru Ishikawa, Guide to Quality Control,
Asian Productivity Organisation, 1991
|